收入差距英语作文

A. 急求一篇英语作文 如何缩小贫富差距

考试是自己的事，上网照抄不是自己真本事。相信我没错，加油！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！

B. 关于贫富差距的英文文献或英文文章

你可以通过你学校的校园网
直接进入中国知网
万方等知名的大数据库
里面有很多学术性的文章可以作为参考
这些数据库如果不通过校园网进的话
阅读库里的文章是要收取费用的

C. 关于收支平衡的英语短文

唉,如果只是一场扑克游戏,是的,
彼此向对方的眼神深深注视
对它来说没有深渊.
嗯!潮湿的窗棂飘动清澈的气泡!
那团云不改变颜色或形状.
它料相隔一层土,哈哈

D. 求英语作文 关于贫富差距的

While china continue to amaze the outside world with its stories of rapid economic growth,the country's Gini Co-efficient-a standard measure of income inequality has exceed the 0.40 threshold viewed as danger level.Although china has lifted hundreds of millions of people out of absolute poverty ring the period of reform and opening,has transformed from planning economy system to marked-oriented system,the gap between the rich and poor remains in rural-urban income as well as in every social classes are widening that will confine the long-term development of national economy as whole.

The per capita disposable income of city dwellers released in 2003 was 8,472 yuan (US$1,024),compared with 2,622 yuan (US$317) of farmers that account for 80% of the national population. approx. 25% of chinese population is in the upper middle class to rich. But the larger segment-about 75% is in the low middle class to poor.Even though the past year of 2004 appears a good one for the country's some 800 million farmers thanks to a substantial recovery in grain price and cuting tax,the task to uplift the farmer income,to narrow the disparity and inequality which will affect society stabilization in rural-urban development level is arous. to achieve a coordinated development between urban and rural areas and to resolve issues concerning agriculture, farmers and rural areas,Wen called for reforms to increase assistance and protection for agriculture, to speed up urbanization, to let cities play a bigger role in promoting the development of rural areas and to coordinate the development of urban and rural areas, by unifying the management of issues like labor, family, compulsory ecation, and taxation.

E. 收入差距越来越大的英文翻译

widen the gap of incomes between people

F. 收入差距的英文怎么说

收入差距
[词典] income divide; income disparity;
[例句]但在很多国家内部，收入差距却扩大了。
But within many countries income gaps have widened

G. 求有关城乡居民收入差距方面的外文翻译：英文3000字和中文5000字

【摘要】改革开放以来，我国城乡居民在收入水平提高的同时，收入差距也在明显扩大。文章通过深入分析各种相关原因对我国城乡居民收入差距变动的影响，揭示其主次顺序，以期为我国缩小城乡差别提供政策依据。
【关键词】城乡收入；差距；原因

党的十六大报告指出，我国刚刚达到的总体小康是低水平的、不完全的、发展很不平衡的小康社会。党的十六届六中全会进一步指出，目前，我国社会总体上是和谐的。但是，也存在不少影响社会和谐的矛盾和问题，主要是城乡、区域、经济社会发展很不平衡，人口资源环境压力加大；就业、社会保障、收入分配、教育、医疗、住房、安全生产、社会治安等方面关系群众切身利益的问题比较突出等。其中发展很不平衡的直接而重要的表现是农民增收迟缓、城乡收入差别过大。2003年城乡居民收入比为3.23：1，2004年稍降至3.21：1。但是，这还不能反映城乡居民生活的实际差距。首先，目前统计农民收入是根据户籍来进行的，少数高收入的非村民掩盖了多数种田的真村民。其次，农民纯收入中包括生产资料费用，扣除后生活费用只剩纯收入的65%。最后，城市居民享有各种住房、医疗、教育、交通以及公共产品等，农民享受不了。因此，国家统计局副局长邱晓华在2002年第五届中国成长企业CEO峰会上指出，中国城乡居民收入差距大大高于帐面上的3：1，这个差距应该为5：1，甚至达到6：1。2004年，由中国社会科学院经济研究所经过数年跟踪所做出的一份全国性调查报告显示，近年来中国城乡收入差距不断拉大，如果把医疗、教育、失业保障等非货币因素考虑进去，中国的城乡收入差距世界最高。
一、制度变迁

中国城乡收入分配差距，是旧的制度体系局部沉淀及新的制度体系尚未完善的制度变迁的特殊过程的结果。计划经济向社会主义市场经济整体制度变迁，使得生产要素有平等的机会参与市场的竞争，按其贡献大小来获取报酬。由于生产要素的获取过程非均等，导致生产要素占有的差异不断加剧，加之市场价格的偏差，通过要素分配这一前提，进而导致收入分配差距的不断扩大和积累。同时，转型过程中相关的利益获得者利用获取的非正常收入，作为要素投入市场竞争，使初次分配的差距结果，又转化为再生产中的生产条件占有的差距，通过正常途径又获取更多的收入，从而使差距更大。
二、城乡不同的产业特性

城乡收入差距首先与城乡产业特性有关。现在的农村虽然包含了多种产业，但农业在农村经济结构中占有重要地位，这与城市有本质区别。无论在农业资源禀赋丰富的欧美，抑或是农业资源禀赋稀缺的东南亚国家和地区，只要存在工业和农业两大部门，其收入差距就一定存在。农产品收入需求弹性小的特点，决定了经济发展达到一定程度后农业增长必然要慢于第二、第三产业。在中国，农业生产率和（城市）工业生产率的差距非常大。即使在考虑了数据误差后，城市工业的生产率仍是农村的9倍。造成生产率巨大差距的原因之一是中国实施资本高度密集的工业化战略。近10年来，我国GDP结构中，第一产业所占比重下降了十多个百分点，相应第二、第三产业上升十多个百分点。工业和农业两大部门的生产方式不同。工业可以重复、连续不断地使用机械化生产，农业则必然与自然交织。现代农业的发展要依赖农业技术进步，但农业科技成果市场化比工业等其他部门更为困难。农业科技投资风险大、周期长、见效慢的特点，使其在与工商业之间以及其他农业生产性投资效益的比较中处于劣势。还有，农业技术推广具有很强的共享性和公益性，农业技术的提供者很难从市场得到相应的回报。与发达国家相比我国对农业科技的投入相对较低，多年来低于农业总产值的0.2%。因此，农业科技的开发、推广、应用等各环节都可能因资金严重不足而陷入困境。
三、二元经济结构的体制与政策

城乡二元社会结构是指城乡之间因为人口流动受到严格约束而出现的一种分割状态。中国自1955年颁布《中华人民共和国户口管理条例》起，就将全国人口截然分成了市民和农民。户籍成为决定城乡居民身份、地位和福利的根本标准，直接导致了城乡居民在获取收入方面的起点的严重不平等。从20世纪90年代以来，随着城市改革的深入推进，我国二元经济结构体制不仅没有调整改善，反而继续强化扩大，已严重阻碍了经济的进一步发展。具体表现如下，首先，相对于我国的经济增长速度，城乡二元结构转换滞后，导致农村大量劳动力闲置，农民收入增长缓慢，城乡差距进一步扩大。其次，城乡二元经济结构体制决定了城乡居民劳动生产率方面的巨大差异。由于农业生产率低下，加之大量农业剩余劳动力一时难以被安置，使原本就收入低的农民在社会急剧变迁阶段与城市居民收入进一步拉大。最后，城乡二元经济结构体制使中国农民在教育、医疗、劳保、养老、福利等社会待遇上，以及就业、分配等经济待遇上不平等，这些不平等更进一步导致了农村居民在以后获取收入能力与机会方面与城镇居民的差距。
四、工业化进程中的工农业产品价格的剪刀差强制性的以赶超为目标的工业化优先发展战略，虽然对社会主义经济建设起到了积极作用，但是对中国城乡收入分配差距却产生了非常深刻的影响。一个非常重要的事实是，在其进程中，依靠行政命令方式产生的工农业产品价格剪刀差直接影响了中国城乡收入分配的格局。中国在计划经济时期实行的工农业价格剪刀差，是将农业部门创造的部分国民收入转换到工业部门，以促进其发展，其本质就是通过行政命令方式强制进行国民收入再分配，这种再分配的结果就是将大量的农业资源转移到工业部门，不可避免地造成了农业生产的低效。改革初期，通过价格改革，部分农产品的国家收购价和市场价已大体持平，但到20世纪80年代后半期差距重新扩大。从全国来看，1950～1978年间通过剪刀差从农业取得了大约5100亿元，改革开放以后的1979～1994年15年间，国家通过剪刀差使农业向城市无偿贡献了大约15000亿元。对城市居民的价格补贴从未中断，20多年来补贴总额超过8000亿元，2001年补贴额达到1043亿元，占政府预算总额的6.57%，这都拉大了城乡收入差距。
五、财政支农政策不尽完善，农民的财政性负担沉重
政府政策的取向对城乡收入差距的走向起着重要的作用，政府财政支出结构的变化是体现政府政策偏好的最直接反应。在市场经济条件下，农业的弱质性和它在国民经济中的重要地位客观上要求国家财政加大对农业的投资力度，支持那些投资大、周期长、风险高，但外在效益显著的项目（如农村基础设施、农业科技研发和推广、生态环境保护等）以弥补市场机制在资源配置中的缺陷，增强农业的竞争力。然而长期以来政府对农村的财政支出不仅有限，而且出现相对下降的趋势，不仅低于发展中国家水平，更低于发达国家水平。近几年尽管国家加大了“三农”的投入力度，进行社会主义新农村建设，但城市偏向的总体格局并未根本改变。在市场经济条件下，政府的职能主要是向公民提供公共产品（服务），为私人产品的生产创造良好的社会环境。对农村

Abstract Since reform and opening up, China's urban and rural residents to raise the income levels at the same time, the income gap has also expanded significantly. Through in-depth analysis of articles related to the reasons for the income gap between urban and rural residents of China's changes, revealing the order of its priorities with a view to narrowing the urban-rural divide in our country in accordance with policy.
Key words urban and rural income; gap; reasons

The report pointed out that the party's National Congress, China has just reached a low level of overall well-off is not complete and is very uneven development of the well-off society. Six 10 Sixth Party Plenum further pointed out that at present, our society is harmonious in general. However, there is a lot of impact on social harmony contradictions and problems, mainly in urban and rural areas, regional, economic and social development is very uneven, increasing pressure on population, resources and environment; employment, social

H. 有关贫富差距的英文作文

Gap between the wealthy and poor
As we know, only if balance each social stratum relations especially between the wealthy and poor can we have a euphonious social.There is no doubt that every country has the gap between the wealthy and poor.So, what is your opinion and how do you think to solve this problem?
From my point of view, what we should do is form a correct concept about is after all it is unavoidable. But, we must take some action rather than imagine at the same time. It needs not only our government’ macro-control but also every citizen’s effort.
On the one hand, I often heart some bad events account for some people are not be respected just because they are poor. It is exactly equal.So,as a citizen, we can help the poor as much as we can even if we don not the rich such as a kind smile, an equality attitude.It may have a big influence if everyone can do it.
On the other hand,it is the most important to envelop our social’s economic. As the old saying goes,“The fundamental task is to develop the proctive forces” So, it may becomes another center of the work.
It is equal between the wealthy and poor. We should learn to help the disadvantaged rather than have a bad attitude.So, let us solve the problem together as much as we can and have a more euphonious social.

I. 跪求英语作文一篇，贫富差距，高手请进

It’s certainly true that without a profit motive, the rational thing to do would be to sit at home all day and play video games — or whatever other pursuit you might choose if you never had to worry about paying the bills. And history shows that government efforts to try to equalize wealth or manage economies usually backfire.

Inequality of wealth, by itself, isn’t new. In the past few decades, there’s evidence that the gap in some countries is widening – including the U.S. But super-rich folks like Forbes 400 billionaires and greedy corporate executives are hardly a recent phenomenon.

A hundred years ago, the wealth gap between the richest robber baron and the poorest farmer was wider than the current spread between a $100-million-a-year CEO and the worst-paid worker. And if you factor in modern health care, “” like cars, TVs and cellphones, the average American today probably enjoys a standard of living on a par with some of the richest Americans a century ago. So a widening income gap and wealth inequity doesn’t seem to have hurt progress.

The issue isn’t whether money is a potent incentive for keeping us all busy trying to buy or build a bigger house or inventing the next cool electronic device. The question is whether the playing field is level. Equality of opportunity isn’t just a matter of fairness. No society can expect to thrive if it doesn’t fully tap the talent and ability of its entire workforce — including those who happen to be born poor.

Economists talk about “human capital” like any other input to their economic models. In theory, free markets will allocate that human capital to the best use by rewarding best work that the market values the most highly.