英語作文懲罰犯罪
A. 怎樣看待大學生被行政拘留和處罰的觀點英語作文
Nowadays, more and more college students are becoming enthusiastic about the healthy development of the society. They even actively participate in the fight against the criminality at the risk of their lives, which has caused a lot of debate among the media. So far as I am concerned, the college students should be very careful in their combat against the criminality for several reasons.
On the one hand, the college students should take their studies as the priority in the four-year campus life. Since they are the very prime of their life ,and time is so precious, they need to concentrate on their development and improvement of the skills for a bright future career. Besides, the society has place too much expectation on them. On the other hand, the college students should deal with the criminality with more strategies. In other words, when they meet the criminals in the real life, they can appeal to the authorities like the police for help. Only in this way can they fight effectively and protect themselves in the mean time.
In conclusion, the college students are supposed to fight against the criminality in an effective but safe manner instead of risking their lives.
如今,越來越多的大學生關心社會的健康發展問題。他們甚至冒著生命危險參與打擊罪犯的活動。這引發了媒體的激烈討論。就我而言,因為一些原因,大學生在與罪犯戰斗時要特別小心。
一方面,在學校的四年生活中,大學生應當以學業為重。因為這四年是他們生命中最重要的部分,而且時間又是如此寶貴,他們應當將精力集中在技術的發展和進步上以博得好前程。此外,社會對他們期望很高。另一方面,面對犯罪行為,大學生應更具策略性。換句話說,在現實生活中遇到犯罪行為時,他們應當訴諸官方當局如警察局尋求幫助。只有這樣他們才能夠有效地打擊罪犯,同時保護好自己。
總之,與其冒生命危險,我們更希望大學生採取安全的有效的方式來與罪犯斗爭。
B. 為什麼懲罰更容易導致犯罪的英語作文
Punishments authorized in modern U.S. law include community service, monetary fines, Forfeiture of property, restitution to victims, confinement in jail or prison, and death.
Some civil sanctions are punitive in nature. The primary aim, though, in most civil cases is to compensate the victim. However, a judge or jury may assess Punitive Damages against a party in a civil case if that party's conct was especially wicked. Punitive damages are intended to punish a party or set an example for similar wrongdoers. Though onerous, punitive damages in a civil case do not carry with them the same stigma attached to criminal punishment.
Human transgressions have been punished in various ways throughout history. The standard punishments in ancient Greek and Roman societies were death, Slavery, mutilation (Corporal Punishment), imprisonment, or Banishment. Some punishments were especially creative. In ancient Rome, for example, a person who murdered a close relative was enclosed in a sack with a cock, a viper, a dog, and a monkey, and then cast into the sea.
The ancient punishments were brought to England. Until the nineteenth century, the death penalty, or Capital Punishment, was imposed in England for more than 200 different crimes. Most of these crimes were petty violations, such as pick-pocketing or swindling. A defendant could be hanged, burned at the stake, or beheaded. In some cases the process of death was drawn out. A person found guilty of Treason, for example, was placed on a rack and stretched, hanged until not quite dead, then disemboweled, beheaded, and quartered (cut into four pieces).
Until the nineteenth century, corporal punishment in England could consist of whipping, branding, or the cutting off of a body part. Noses, ears, hands, fingers, toes, and feet were all subject to removal for criminal acts. Often the body part sliced off was the part thought responsible for the act. A pickpocket, for example, might have a hand cut off, and a spy might lose an ear, tongue, or eye. Corporal punishment could be inflicted in addition to other punishments, such as banishment, forced labor, or short-term incarceration.
The American colonies adopted and cultivated the traditional punishments of England. The most common punishments were corporal and capital. Petty criminals were often sentenced to a combination of corporal punishment and incarceration in jail for several months. The punishment for more serious crimes was usually death.
Punishment was the most comprehensive and severe in colonies founded on religious principles. In Massachusetts, controlled by the Puritans, a woman who committed Altery could be forced to wear the letter A in public as a punishing reminder of her conct. Men who committed altery were put to death, as were those who engaged in bestiality.
The witch trials in Salem, Massachusetts, illustrated the inventiveness of punishment in some of the colonies. In 1692, 19 people were executed after children claimed that several women were practicing witchcraft. One of the alleged witnesses, who refused to participate in the trials, was slowly pressed to death under the weight of heavy rocks.
Theories of Punishment
Governments have several theories to support the use of punishment to maintain order in society.
Theories of punishment can be divided into two general philosophies: utilitarian and retributive. The utilitarian theory of punishment seeks to punish offenders to discourage, or "deter," future wrongdoing. The retributive theory seeks to punish offenders because they deserve to be punished.
Under the utilitarian philosophy, laws should be used to maximize the happiness of society. Because crime and punishment are inconsistent with happiness, they should be kept to a minimum. Utilitarians understand that a crime-free society does not exist, but they endeavor to inflict only as much punishment as is required to prevent future crimes.
The utilitarian theory is "consequentialist" in nature. It recognizes that punishment has consequences for both the offender and society and holds that the total good proced by the punishment should exceed the total evil. In other words, punishment should not be unlimited. One illustration of consequentialism in punishment is the release of a prison inmate suffering from a debilitating illness. If the prisoner's death is imminent, society is not served by his continued confinement because he is no longer capable of committing crimes.
Under the utilitarian philosophy, laws that specify punishment for criminal conct should be designed to deter future criminal conct. Deterrence operates on a specific and a general level. General deterrence means that the punishment should prevent other people from committing criminal acts. The punishment serves as an example to the rest of society, and it puts others on notice that criminal behavior will be punished.
Specific deterrence means that the punishment should prevent the same person from committing crimes. Specific deterrence works in two ways. First, an offender may be put in jail or prison to physically prevent her from committing another crime for a specified period. Second, this incapacitation is designed to be so unpleasant that it will discourage the offender from repeating her criminal behavior.
Rehabilitation is another utilitarian rationale for punishment. The goal of rehabilitation is to prevent future crime by giving offenders the ability to succeed within the confines of the law. Rehabilitative measures for criminal offenders usually include treatment for afflictions such as mental illness, chemical dependency, and chronic violent behavior. Rehabilitation also includes the use of ecational programs that give offenders the knowledge and skills needed to compete in the job market.
The counterpart to the utilitarian theory of punishment is the retributive theory. Under this theory, offenders are punished for criminal behavior because they deserve punishment. Criminal behavior upsets the peaceful balance of society, and punishment helps to restore the balance.
The retributive theory focuses on the crime itself as the reason for imposing punishment. Where the utilitarian theory looks forward by basing punishment on social benefits, the retributive theory looks backward at the transgression as the basis for punishment.
According to the retributivist, human beings have free will and are capable of making rational decisions. An offender who is insane or otherwise incompetent should not be punished. However, a person who makes a conscious choice to upset the balance of society should be punished.
There are different moral bases for retribution. To many retributivists, punishment is justified as a form of vengeance: wrongdoers should be forced to suffer because they have forced others to suffer. This ancient principle was expressed succinctly in the Old Testament of the Judeo-Christian Bible: "When a man causes a disfigurement in his neighbour … it shall be done to him, fracture for fracture, eye for eye, tooth for tooth…."
To other theorists, retribution against a wrongdoer is justified to protect the legitimate rights of both society and the offender. Society shows its respect for the free will of the wrongdoer through punishment. Punishment shows respect for the wrongdoer because it allows an offender to pay the debt to society and then return to society, theoretically free of guilt and stigma.
A third major rationale for punishment is denunciation. Under the denunciation theory, punishment should be an expression of societal condemnation. The denunciation theory is a hybrid of Utilitarianism and retribution. It is utilitarian because the prospect of being publicly denounced serves as a deterrent. Denunciation is likewise retributive because it promotes the idea that offenders deserve to be punished.
The U.S. conception of punishment is a combination of the utilitarian, retributive, and denunciation theories. The most widely accepted rationale for punishment in the United States is retribution. If convicted, the sentence a defendant receives is always, at least in part, a form of retribution.
A sentence may, however, combine utilitarian ideals with retribution. For example, a defendant sentenced to prison for several years is sent there to quench the public's thirst for vengeance. At the same time, ecational programs inside the prison reflect the utilitarian goal of rehabilitation.
Our legal system shows its adherence to utilitarian ideals in the creation of systems such as pretrial diversion programs,Probation, and Parole. These systems seek to limit punishment to the extent necessary to protect society. The utilitarian philosophy is also reflected in the assignment of different punishments for different crimes and in the notion that the amount of punishment a convicted criminal receives should be in proportion to the harm caused by the crime. For example, murder calls for imprisonment or even the death penalty. A simple Assault and Battery with no serious injuries is usually punished with a short jail sentence or probation and a fine.
Judges generally have the discretion to fashion punishment according to the needs of both society and the defendant. This is an expression of utilitarian tenets. However, judicial discretion in sentencing is limited. In some cases statutes require judges to impose mandatory minimum prison sentences as punishment, and these laws stand as a monument to the retributive theory.
C. 英文論文翻譯 這是一篇關於死刑的議論文,還請高人幫我翻譯一下,不要用翻譯工具(金山快譯之類的)敷衍我
請想像一下:你正在為你的謀殺罪接受審判,盡管你是無辜的,但你還是被判刑了.你將被給予死刑的處罰,你的生命將被奪去.那是一切的結束--包括你的家庭生活,你的朋友,你的目標,你的未來.誰又會支持這一切的發生呢?死刑是不人道的,它殘害的不僅是有罪之人,還包括那些無辜的生命.它也增加了謀殺率,而這種結果和其初衷背道而馳,同樣也是違法的.
死刑是不道德而又野蠻的.它用謀殺的手段懲罰了謀殺者,推動了暴力的蔓延.無論處決方式是致命毒葯的注射還是典型,它都是殘忍的,是一級的蓄意謀殺罪。你會因小孩踢人而責備他嗎?我們學到的是兩個錯誤並不會指向正確,更多的謀殺並非合適的解決方法。
死刑違背了美國人的道德觀和價值觀。《獨立宣言》指出每一個都有不可剝奪的生存權。同時,政府的責任也在於保護公民的生命,但是,死刑帶走了這一切。《人權法案》禁止殘酷和不尋常的懲戒手段。那麼,謀殺難道不殘忍嗎?我們都是聲稱用謀殺抗爭謀殺的虛偽者,而死刑傳遞的信息正是:在美國,謀殺能被接受,甚至連政府都在殺人。
死刑不能解決任何問題,而僅僅是製造了更多的痛苦和悲劇。死刑犯的家屬不僅僅要面對罪犯應承擔的賠償和審判,更需要接受愛人死亡的慘痛事實。這對於那些被無辜處死的人是尤其悲痛欲絕的。有研究表明死刑不是如同其初衷那樣,作為謀殺的推遲,而只是把我們推向了比起初的情況更為糟糕的深淵。
許多美國的道德准則源於基督教的信仰。《聖經》內含大量反對死刑的篇章。上帝為我們的生活方式樹立了典範,只要你懇求原諒,他將寬恕所有的事情,並請求你「寬恕所有觸犯了我們的人」。《聖經》還提到我們不應復仇,但當我們處決了某些人是,這恰恰是我們所做不到的。沒有人應是第一個被殺的對象,把殺人作為懲罰方式也是同樣不合理的。
其中,死刑帶來的最壞後果是無辜的生命必定會被剝奪。最近,在伊利諾伊州,13個被列在死亡名單上的人直到他們被處決的那一天才被證明是無辜的。他們承受的莫大痛苦是難以言喻的。想像一下,當你沒犯罪卻被政府判以死刑的情景吧!終結他人的生命是沒有任何挽回的餘地的。
死刑不會帶來積極的結果。我們為何要杜絕謀殺?因為我們想採取行動廢除死亡的懲罰。剝奪生命永遠是不正當的。
D. 英語作文(120-150)只需要中文提綱!但是請確保你會翻譯。 很多國家,犯罪水平在上升,暴力水平在提升。
在我看來,犯罪水平和暴力水平的提升給很多國家帶來了極大的危害。普通人們版有的財權務損失,有的甚至丟掉性命。必須採取措施來降低犯罪和暴力水平。
要降低犯罪和暴力水平主要有三大措施。首先,國家應該針對這些犯罪完善立法。有了相關的法律,犯罪和暴力就會受到扼制。其次,執法機關(警察和法院)應該嚴格執法。凡是有犯罪和暴力者都應該得到應有的懲罰。這樣對犯罪和暴力也是一個強大的威脅。第三,普通的人們也應該增強反對犯罪和暴力的意識,一旦有這樣的情況,立即報警,或者採取適當的方式與之斗爭。
犯罪和暴力不降低,人們就無法正常地工作生活,只有採取了適當的措施,減少犯罪和暴力,社會才會更加安定、安全。
其實很好翻譯的。記得使用四、六級核心詞彙,記得及時採納哦。
E. 英語作文犯罪與懲罰的
兩個題目選一個就行吧。寫第一個。
An Analysis on the indispensabilities of law and punishment.
(法律與刑法之所以不可缺少的簡析)
Law and punishment are two main weapons we have to fight against crime,without which our life will be on the edge of crash.Punishment could be compared as a sword,it protect us from the crime and warn thoses who plan to do the bad things.On the other hand punishment could leave the criminals a good lesson in order to rebuild them into good people.Both facts prove that punishment has a irreplaceable effect on recing the crimes.So that is why punishment is indispensable.
挺不好寫的,不是太簡練,而且確實都是點空話,但希望對你有幫助。
F. 英文作文「cyber crimes」的翻譯
With the popularity of Internet, cyber crimes are a serious problem, people』s computer will be easily attacked, because cyber criminals are everywhere on the Internet. The personal computer is no longer safe completely, we must take the measures to deal with cyber criminals. The government should reinforce the law to give heavy punishment to the cyber criminals. The people who are talented in computer technology should be trained to improve the computer defense system and more effective firewalls should be built up. What』s more, people should pay attention to not click the illegal websites. All these measures are working to protect the security of the Internet, there is still a long way to go.
隨著網路的廣泛受歡迎,網路犯罪是一個嚴重的問題,人們的電腦會很容易受到攻擊,因為網路罪犯無處不在。私人電腦不再是完全安全的,我們必須採取一些措施來應對網路犯罪。政府應該加強法律,給予網路罪犯以沉重的懲罰。擅長電腦技術的人應該通過受訓來改善電腦防禦系統和建立更多有效的防火牆。而且,人們應該注意不要點擊不合法的網站。所有的這些措施實施是為了保護電腦的安全,但是這仍然有很長的路要走。
G. 對酒駕的人第一次就處罰的英語作文
of drunk driving, I will think of two accidents caused by drunk driving. The first thing that happens is that
My home downstairs, and the other is to eat at the time of Hangzhou to hear. I first took the first place in my house downstairs in the car accident! That night, I was quietly watching
Book, all of a sudden, I was a sudden brake sound to break the mood of reading. I rushed to the balcony to see a
What has happened to the next. I can not see clearly on the balcony, so, I went downstairs to look at
Because I was too timid to go in the past, so I asked a side of the aunt: "Auntie, what happened
Thing?" Aunt said to me: "the big truck hit a bike, the bike hit the fly! This is because the goods
Car driver drunk driving!" And one of the things I've heard about in Hangzhou. We were having dinner that day, and suddenly the lights went out.
H. 有關國家減少犯罪的唯一辦法是蝕寫真懲罰更重的英語作文
唯一辦法 = = 這么極端哦
I. 英語作文 懲罰真的能制止犯罪么
0分,誰幫你寫?