反對克隆英語作文
㈠ 關於克隆的英語作文(很急)
如果說格雷的第一張人體解剖圖解開了人體結構之迷,奠定了近代醫學的基礎,但同時也給人類帶來很大的困惑.
女媧造人時,上天便賜於我們眼睛.有一天人們用它第一次在水中驚喜地看見了自己的倒影,而後人們通過鏡子看自己,直到現在,人們又通過基因這一特殊的鏡子,以一種全新的形式審視自己,由此審視世界.
我們欣喜地看到了基因研究利用的廣闊前景.隨著轉基技術的運用,水仙的基因已被植入水稻,使之含鐵量明顯的增高;隨著人們對基因的了解,克隆技術應運而生;第一隻克隆羊多利活生生地站在了人們面前;隨著克隆技術的發展,人類的器官可以被克隆,有望用新器官接替我們已老損的器官.......如此種種讓人類似乎已可充當第二個上帝,或者說第二個女媧了.有人說上帝總是一手拿著答案,一手拿著問號.
克隆是英語單詞clone的音譯,clone源於希臘文klon,原意是細苗或嫩枝以無性繁殖或者營養繁殖的方式培育植物,隨著時間的推移,克隆的內涵已經擴大了,只要是由1個細胞獲得2個以上的細胞,細胞群或生物體,由一個親本序列產生的DNA的序列,就是克隆.
克隆就如一把雙刃劍.
每當春暖花開的時候,喜歡弄草的人便會做植物扦插;一種外觀像蘋果而味道似梨的水果—蘋果梨,就是採用果樹嫁接法培養而成的,扦插和嫁接實質上也是克隆.也是對人類的好處.克隆人體器官對醫學發展也有很大促進作用,更是對身患癌症或殘疾人的一個福音.
克隆人與親本間的輩分關系,克隆人該是作為父輩,子輩或同一輩分或者是其它,這與我們平常所遵循的長幼有分起了矛盾,也會混亂各種社會人際關系.
克隆人是對人的不種不尊重表現.克隆人,就不只是件復製品.倘若人可以隨意克隆,那就是就每個人都擁有無數次生命.此時再講生命的價值已毫無意義了.這是否也意味著生命可以任意踐踏,人格可以任意傷害 這又與我們平時所強調的尊重每個人的生命.生命只有一次又從何談起 一個人,如果連對自已生命的自主權都沒有,那他的生存意義何在
克隆人會給野心家和不法分子有利可乘.我們不能不考慮到有可能克隆人將引發一聲戰爭.野心家利用克隆人征服全球,這似乎在科幻小說中才能見到.但現實生活中並不是完全不可能.而利用克隆人作案,危害人身安全更是可想而知.
我們應該理智地看待克隆,將它變為對人類有利的科學技術而非人類走向滅亡的武器
追問:
「克隆就如一把雙刃劍」 .....「將它變為對人類有利的科學技術而非人類走向滅亡的武器 」
.後能再有一些議論么 , 我想構造進作文中 ..
回答:
克隆本是有功,而無罪,有罪的是人們的心。人們應利用克隆去造福人類,而不應當利用克隆毀滅人類!
㈡ 哪裡有一篇關於克隆技術利與弊的英語作文(
If Gray's first human anatomy solved the mystery of human structure, laid the foundation of modern medicine, but also to human beings a great deal of confusion. Nu Wa made man, the God will give to our eyes. There One day people use it for the first time in the water pleasantly surprised to see his own reflection, then people see themselves through the mirror, until now, people passed the gene of this particular mirror, to form a new look at ourselves, this look at the world . We are pleased to see that the use of broad prospects for genetic research. With the use of transgenic technology, daffodils rice genes have been implanted so that the iron content increased significantly; as people's understanding of gene cloning technology should be shipped born; first cloned sheep Dolly living people standing before; With the development of cloning technology, human organs can be cloned, is expected to take over with a new organ has been so old and damaged organs ....... all human beings seem to be as a second God, or Goddess of the second. Some say that God always answers in one hand, one hand and a question mark. Cloning is the English transliteration of the word clone, clone derived from the Greek klon The intention is that small seedlings or shoots to asexual reproction or vegetative propagation means cultivating plants, over time, cloning has expanded the content, as long as the cells obtained from a more than 2 cells, cell populations or organisms by a pro-sequence generated by the sequence of DNA that is cloned. Clone as a double-edged sword. When the spring time, like to get people who will do grass cutting plant; a look like apples and pears taste like fruit - pear, is the use of fruit grafting culture from cuttings and grafting are essentially clones. is also a benefit to humanity. Cloning of human organs for medical development to a large extent, but is suffering from cancer or disability a gospel people. Cloning and generational relations between parents, as fathers of the human cloning, sub-generation, or the same seniority in the family or other, which we usually followed by old and young took part in starting the conflict, will be confusion all social relationships. human cloning is no kind of disrespect for human performance. human cloning, not just pieces of . If people are free to clone, that is, each person has countless lives. then revisit the value of life has no meaning. Does this also mean that life can be arbitrarily trampled on, and personality to any damage which in turn are usually emphasized in our respect for human life. life once they begin to talk about a person, if even on their own life autonomy are not, then what is the meaning of his survival of human cloning will benefit a mere careerist and lawless elements. We can not take into account the possibility of human cloning will lead soon as the war. careerist use human cloning to conquer the world, it seems science fiction can be seen. but in real life is not altogether unlikely. take advantage of human cloning committed crimes, crimes against personal safety even imagine. We should rationally look at cloning, it becomes beneficial to science and technology on human rather than the demise of human arms.如果說格雷的第一張人體解剖圖解開了人體結構之迷,奠定了近代醫學的基礎,但同時也給人類帶來很大的困惑.
女媧造人時,上天便賜於我們眼睛.有一天人們用它第一次在水中驚喜地看見了自己的倒影,而後人們通過鏡子看自己,直到現在,人們又通過基因這一特殊的鏡子,以一種全新的形式審視自己,由此審視世界.
我們欣喜地看到了基因研究利用的廣闊前景.隨著轉基技術的運用,水仙的基因已被植入水稻,使之含鐵量明顯的增高;隨著人們對基因的了解,克隆技術應運而生;第一隻克隆羊多利活生生地站在了人們面前;隨著克隆技術的發展,人類的器官可以被克隆,有望用新器官接替我們已老損的器官.......如此種種讓人類似乎已可充當第二個上帝,或者說第二個女媧了.有人說上帝總是一手拿著答案,一手拿著問號.
克隆是英語單詞clone的音譯,clone源於希臘文klon,原意是細苗或嫩枝以無性繁殖或者營養繁殖的方式培育植物,隨著時間的推移,克隆的內涵已經擴大了,只要是由1個細胞獲得2個以上的細胞,細胞群或生物體,由一個親本序列產生的DNA的序列,就是克隆.
克隆就如一把雙刃劍.
每當春暖花開的時候,喜歡弄草的人便會做植物扦插;一種外觀像蘋果而味道似梨的水果—蘋果梨,就是採用果樹嫁接法培養而成的,扦插和嫁接實質上也是克隆.也是對人類的好處.克隆人體器官對醫學發展也有很大促進作用,更是對身患癌症或殘疾人的一個福音.
克隆人與親本間的輩分關系,克隆人該是作為父輩,子輩或同一輩分或者是其它,這與我們平常所遵循的長幼有分起了矛盾,也會混亂各種社會人際關系.
克隆人是對人的不種不尊重表現.克隆人,就不只是件復製品.倘若人可以隨意克隆,那就是就每個人都擁有無數次生命.此時再講生命的價值已毫無意義了.這是否也意味著生命可以任意踐踏,人格可以任意傷害 這又與我們平時所強調的尊重每個人的生命.生命只有一次又從何談起 一個人,如果連對自已生命的自主權都沒有,那他的生存意義何在
克隆人會給野心家和不法分子有利可乘.我們不能不考慮到有可能克隆人將引發一聲戰爭.野心家利用克隆人征服全球,這似乎在科幻小說中才能見到.但現實生活中並不是完全不可能.而利用克隆人作案,危害人身安全更是可想而知.
我們應該理智地看待克隆,將它變為對人類有利的科學技術而非人類走向滅亡的武器.
㈢ 步什反對克隆的演講稿(中英對照) 急!!!
美國總統反對克隆人類早期胚胎
東方網11月28日消息:美國總統布希26日對一家美國公司宣布率先用克隆技術製造出人類胚胎作出反應,稱該公司的做法「從道德上講是錯誤的」。
布希在白宮對記者說,克隆人類胚胎是錯誤的。作為一個社會,我們不應該在培育生命之後又將其毀滅。他說,他過去已經明確表示反對進行這樣的研究,他的立場沒有任何改變。他呼籲美國參議院採取行動,通過禁止克隆人的法案。
又訊:美國先進細胞技術公司利用成年人體細胞首次成功克隆出人類早期胚胎的消息傳出後,法國生物學家及生物倫理學家紛紛發表意見,強烈批評美國科學家的做法,認為這一實驗結果不但沒有科學意義,而且跨越了人類恪守的禁區,是對生物倫理的嚴重挑釁。
法國國家農藝學研究所動物克隆專家讓-保羅·勒納爾表示,美先進細胞技術公司所使用的方法實際上就是5年前克隆「多利」羊的方法,並非什麼新技術。因此,美國科學家的這一結果從科研角度來講意義不大。
法國生物倫理學家讓-弗朗索瓦·馬太也表示,美國科學家的這一做法是非常危險的,他們在世界上第一個跨越了人類的禁區。
The president of the United States against the cloning of human embryos
Oriental Network November 28th news: the United States President Bush 26 of an American company announced the first cloning technology to create human embryo responded, saying the company practice" it is morally wrong".
Bush told reporters at the White House, the cloning of human embryos is wrong. As a society, we should not be in the cultivation of life after its destruction. He says, he has made clear his opposition to conct such research, his position without any change. He called for the United States Senate action, through legislation that would ban human cloning.
News: the United States advanced cell technology using alt human cells for the first time successfully cloned human embryos after the news came out, French biologist and bioethicists express an opinion in succession, strongly criticized the United States scientists approach, that the results of this experiment are not only scientific significance, but also across the human abide by the area, is the bioethics severe provocation.
The French national agronomic Institute of animal cloning expert let Paul Renard said, the United States advanced cell technology the method used is actually 5 years ago" Dolly" clone sheep method, is not a new technology. Therefore, the United States scientists that result from the research perspective of little significance.
French bioethicists make - Matthew Francois also said the United States scientists, this practice is very dangerous, they are the world's first across human area.
美國總統布希再次強調反對克隆人
在美國一家生物技術公司科研人員宣布對克隆人的研究已獲得醫學突破之際,美國總統布希25日再次表示,絕對反對克隆人。
白宮發言人米勒懷思說,總統布希已經「表明了百分之百反對任何形式克隆人的態度」,並且全力支持美國眾議院通過禁止克隆人的議案。同時,布希還建議參議院也通過此項議案。
The president of the United States against the cloning of human embryos
Oriental Network November 28th news: the United States President Bush 26 of an American company announced the first cloning technology to create human embryo responded, saying the company practice" it is morally wrong".
Bush told reporters at the White House, the cloning of human embryos is wrong. As a society, we should not be in the cultivation of life after its destruction. He says, he has made clear his opposition to conct such research, his position without any change. He called for the United States Senate action, through legislation that would ban human cloning.
News: the United States advanced cell technology using alt human cells for the first time successfully cloned human embryos after the news came out, French biologist and bioethicists express an opinion in succession, strongly criticized the United States scientists approach, that the results of this experiment are not only scientific significance, but also across the human abide by the area, is the bioethics severe provocation.
The French national agronomic Institute of animal cloning expert let Paul Renard said, the United States advanced cell technology the method used is actually 5 years ago" Dolly" clone sheep method, is not a new technology. Therefore, the United States scientists that result from the research perspective of little significance.
French bioethicists make - Matthew Francois also said the United States scientists, this practice is very dangerous, they are the world's first across human area.2011,11月26.
㈣ 克隆的利與弊英語作文
My View on Clone
With the repid development of technology, clone comes to the world. It can plicate creature, which means it can make contribution to the proction. People can pay a little and get a lot in the end. However, it also has disavantages. I think as the development of the high-tech, people can use clone to humen beings. It』s so horrible for me to know that there is someone the same with me. But in general, clone has more advantages than disadvantages.
㈤ 關於克隆的英語作文
There are some rare endangered animal, country has the giant panda, dolphin and so on. Cloning technology can use them? The pair of pandas for cloning problems, has caused controversy among scientists concerned, then, cloning of endangered animal also exist what difficulty? These difficulties there may be overcome? The difficulty is in endangered species of wild animal animal compared to ordinary world, present a minimal amount of available for cloning experiments, indivial is less. The ji as an example, the remaining also foot 100, Wuhan dolphin hall wife raise " cake ", is available to scientists cloning experiments on a few indivials, but it is a male, even if successful cloning, finally the clone son may also be governed by it to do "" surrogate mother ". Dolly's birth process, scientists used a total of 3 " false mother ", use a total of 277 embryos will succeed in the end. The difficulties of two so far, there are many endangered wild animal growth process, living habits and to grasp. The class has been successfully cloned sheep, rabbits, pigs, monkeys and other animal, for they live well, cloning of these animal course than cloning of wild animal much easier, the success rate is much greater. Difficult three some endangered animal 's special living environment, caused scientists clone their process will encounter many thought. For example, because it is a streamlined life in the water, it lives in the land of Ganges RIver sheep, monkey, living environment is the same, so cloning experiments, the process, technical difficulty of operation will increase. Therefore, e to save these difficulties, in theory, although cloning endangered wild animal is feasible, but, depending on the cloning technology to save endangered animal the possibility is very small. However, with the cloning of progress and development, believe scientists will graally overcome some difficulties, let the cloning of endangered wild animal ideal truly, make these precious animal classes become friends, let them long to become a part of the world.
㈥ 反對克隆的英文句子
be against cloning
object to cloning
很高興為你解答!
老師祝你學習進步!
望採納,多謝你的問題!^_^
㈦ 求一篇關於《我同意克隆人》或《我不同意克隆人》的英語作文 120詞左右。
自己以前寫的,沒想到現在能用上,你參考參考,希望能幫到你。如果有不懂得地方再問我吧
Thanks to burgeoning technology, the past decades have witnessed the thriving of clone technology. And its application into human has made clone reach an unprecedented peak. This marvel gives rise to much concern among scientific community. However, whether human cloning should be advocated has aroused heat argument. As far as I am concerned, the merits of human cloning outweigh its demerits.
On one hand, it』s safe to say that even the best clone technology has the possibility of failure, and this truth is also publicly known by scientific researchers. Therefore, human cloning is the inlgence of this possibility. Once it fails, it will do harm to cloned men. From animal cloning experiments, the survival rate of the cloned species is very low. Unfortunately, these cloned species that have survived often have more or less some physical problems. Nowadays, many researchers have begun to clone a human being, which leads to the birth of disabled infants because of the failure of human cloning experiments. These crude phenomena leave us with a chill. They are the evidence of the crime resulting from human cloning and the trample on human life. In order to succeed, those crazy scientists cruelly kill the lives of many cloned men, which is no doubt crimes rather than researches. Do any rational persons will support a research at the cost of killing people? What is worse, result of this research will bring people with terrible disasters. This research is a kind of technological progress that will make man liable to extinction.
On the other hand, even if the cloning human experiments will succeed, it will also make chaos on civil legal relationship. It』s clear that cloned men have no guardians. As is known to all, nature persons all have guardians. Who are the parents of the cloned men? In fact, cloned men can』t find their parents no matter through which experiment. They are only research results of researchers. It would be irresponsible to clone a human being, for they will become orphans thoroughly after they are born. On that circumstance, will those crazy scientists undertake the responsibility of fostering these cloned men? Perhaps no one will believe. It』s incredible to imagine that one will live a happy life that has both physical problems and lower social standing. Who will be willing to ecate them? Cloned men are just victims and experimental games.
Technology is a double-edged sword. Used properly, it will be advantageous to the whole society. Used improperly, it will have great negative effects. On balance I hold on the stance that the scourge of human cloning is tremendous. To sum up, this technology should be restricted and the government should take effective measures to do with it.
㈧ 求助 關於克隆你有什麼看法 英語作文 120詞左右
對克隆持反對意見的原創文章:
While cloning provides many immediately obvious benefits, it also opens a Pandora box that will destroy social orders as we know it. Human society functions based on succession of generations and on each generation's DNA being different from the previous. With cloning, both of those will be changed forever. Cloning will allow those who can afford to proce fully transplantable organs to replace their aging organs and therefore possibly live to be hundreds of years old. Some may attempt to clone a complete of themselves and it means two generations will have exactly the same genetic composition. With line of generations blurred and unique genetic compositions across generations no longer a guarantee, human society as we know it will no longer be possible. And once this Pandora box is opened, it can never be closed again.
㈨ 克隆的好處壞處 英文回答。
可以使一些瀕臨滅絕的動物得以種族延續,並在醫學上有好處,克隆人雖然有很多壞處但它也可以使許多沒有生育能力的人完成夢想現在科學界把克隆分為治療性克隆和生殖性克隆兩種。前者是利用胚胎幹細胞克隆人體器官,供醫學研究、解決器官移植供體不足問題,這是國際科學界和倫理學界都支持的,但有一個前提,就是用於治療性克隆的胚胎不能超出妊娠14天這一界限。而對於生殖性克隆,即通常所說的克隆人,由於它在總體上違背了生命倫理原則,所以,科學家的主流意見是堅決反對的。聯合國教科文組織、世界衛生組織和國際人類基因組倫理委員會和各國政府也都非常明確地表示,反對生殖性克隆。
Can make some of the endangered animals continue to race, and medical benefits of human cloning, in spite of many disadvantages, but it can also make many people unable to have children now dream of the completion of the scientific community to be divided into therapeutic cloning and reproctive cloning Two types of cloning. The former is the use of embryonic stem cell cloning of human organs for medical research to address the shortage of donor organ transplants, which is the international scientific community and the ethics community support, but there is a premise that is used for therapeutic cloning of embryos pregnancy can not exceed 14 The limits of the day. As for reproctive cloning, known as human cloning, since it generally goes against the principles of bioethics, so the scientists, the mainstream opinion is strongly against it. UNESCO, the World Health Organization and the International Human Genome Ethics Commission and the governments are very clear that opposition to reproctive cloning.